IT compliance software for the team that got handed compliance
Nobody hired you to run compliance, but here it is: access reviews, asset inventories, evidence requests, and an audit date. Complies puts all of it on a calendar that chases people for you.
IT compliance software keeps the recurring work, access reviews, asset inventory, evidence collection, and policy renewals, on a schedule with named owners, so an IT team can run compliance as a side job without anything slipping. That last part is the real product, because in most 5 to 200 person companies compliance was never a role; it was an email that ended up in IT's queue. Complies connects to AWS, Azure, Okta, Google Workspace, GitHub, Slack, and Jira, builds an obligation tracker from your chosen frameworks, and turns each requirement into a task with an owner and a due date on the compliance calendar. Quarterly access reviews stop depending on someone remembering, evidence items recur automatically, and reminders go out without you sending them. Controls are cross-mapped across SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS, so one asset inventory or one offboarding checklist satisfies every framework that asks for it. The readiness score gives you a number to report upward, and the gap list gives you the argument for the resources you have been requesting. Prices are published from $79 a month.
The heavy lifting is done by compliance tracking software and compliance evidence collection, with iso 27001 compliance software and soc 2 compliance software built in.
What this looks like from where you sit
Compliance is a side job with audit stakes
IT owns compliance on top of tickets, upgrades, and onboarding. The work stays invisible until an audit or a customer questionnaire makes every skipped quarter visible at once.
Access reviews depend on memory
Quarterly access reviews across AWS, Okta, and Google Workspace happen when someone remembers. Skipped quarters surface in the audit as findings with your name on the control.
Evidence requests interrupt real work
Every audit and questionnaire triggers a scavenger hunt through consoles and chat history. Collecting evidence by hand costs around 120 engineer-hours per audit cycle, all unplanned.
What changes in the first month
Every obligation on a calendar with a name
Recurring requirements become scheduled tasks with owners and due dates. The calendar sends the reminders, so chasing colleagues stops being part of your job description.
Access reviews that actually recur
Reviews across your identity and cloud providers are scheduled, assigned, and evidenced in one place, so the auditor sees four clean quarters instead of two and a gap.
Asset and vendor inventories that stay true
Inventories live as maintained records tied to controls, not a spreadsheet snapshot from the last audit, so drift gets caught when it happens rather than at fieldwork.
One collection, five frameworks
Evidence is captured once and reused across every cross-mapped framework and audit cycle, so adding ISO 27001 to your SOC 2 does not double IT's workload.
Asked by teams like yours
Spreadsheets record work; they do not drive it. Nothing in a spreadsheet reminds an owner, recurs a quarterly review, flags a gap, or maps one control to five frameworks. The failure mode is silent: the tab is accurate the week after the audit and stale by the next quarter. Complies makes the schedule active, with reminders, owners, and a readiness score that drops when reality drifts, which is exactly what a side-job compliance program needs.
AWS, Azure, GitHub, Google Workspace, Okta, Slack, and Jira. Those connections let Complies see the systems where your access, change, and identity evidence actually lives, pre-fill your control map, and route tasks where your team already works, including reminders in Slack and tickets in Jira. Anything outside the integration list can still be tracked manually with owners, due dates, and uploaded evidence.
Yes, and that is usually the better pattern. Audit-ready export packs bundle controls, evidence, and policies into an organized package you hand the auditor, so fieldwork runs on prepared material instead of screen-share archaeology. On the Scale tier, roles and permissions also let you scope what internal users see. Most teams find the export pack alone cuts the back-and-forth of an audit noticeably.
ISO 27001 Checklist: 13 Steps From Scope to Certification
CROSS-FRAMEWORKAudit Evidence Examples: What Auditors Actually Ask For
Audit-ready without the hire
Growth covers every framework at $199 a month, billed yearly.