Compliance reporting software that answers the board and the questionnaire
Board-readable readiness reports and questionnaire answers drawn from the same live controls and evidence, so what you report is what is actually true.
Compliance reporting software turns your live compliance state into documents other people can act on: readiness reports a board can read in five minutes, and security questionnaire automation that drafts answers to customer questionnaires from your actual controls and evidence rather than from memory. Complies generates both from the same source of truth as your obligation tracker, so a report never claims a control status the underlying evidence does not support. Board reports show the readiness score per framework, the trend since last quarter, the top open gaps, and what closing them costs in effort, in plain language rather than framework jargon. For sales, the questionnaire workflow matters most: a 200-question security questionnaire that normally eats two weeks of pinging engineers for screenshots gets pre-filled from your mapped controls, with a human reviewing and approving every answer before anything is sent, and each answer linked to its supporting evidence. Reports and questionnaire answers are included from the Growth plan at $199 per month billed yearly, prices published on the site, no sales call. One honest limitation: reports reflect your real state, including the gaps. Complies will not dress up an unfinished control as finished, because a report that flatters you into a failed audit helps nobody.
It works alongside audit readiness and compliance evidence collection, and plugs straight into soc 2 compliance software, gdpr compliance software on every plan from Growth up.
What changes when it is in place
Board reports in plain language
Readiness score per framework, trend since last quarter, top gaps, and the effort to close them, readable by a director in five minutes without a compliance glossary.
Security questionnaire automation
Customer questionnaires get pre-filled from your mapped controls and evidence, a human approves every answer, and the two-week engineer-pinging exercise becomes an afternoon of review.
Every claim backed by evidence
Answers and report lines link to the controls and evidence behind them, so when a prospect asks for proof of an answer, it is one click away, not an archaeology project.
Honest by construction
Reports are generated from live state and will show open gaps as open. What you send a board or a customer is what an auditor would find.
Common questions
Complies matches incoming questionnaire questions to your mapped controls and evidence, drafts an answer per question with the supporting source linked, and flags questions it cannot answer from your data rather than guessing. A human reviews and approves everything before it is sent. Teams report questionnaires that used to take two weeks of chasing engineers getting turned around in an afternoon.
The readiness score per framework, the trend since the previous report, the top open gaps ranked by impact, evidence freshness, and the estimated effort to close what is open, all in plain language. It is designed for a director with five minutes, not a GRC analyst, and every line traces back to live controls if anyone wants the detail.
Yes, and for questionnaires a human approval step is required, not optional. What you cannot do is make a report claim a control status the underlying data does not support: generated content reflects your live state, gaps included. If a report needs to look better, the honest fix is closing gaps, and the gap list tells you exactly which ones move the number most.
SOC 2 Audit Cost: Real Price Breakdown for 2026
GDPRGDPR Compliance Checklist: 12 Steps for Small and Mid-Size Companies
Put reports on autopilot
All plans include it. Prices are public. Start today.