GOVERN · PROTECT · PROVE
NIST CSF compliance software for small and mid-size teams that have to show a NIST CSF 2.0 program with dated evidence
A customer contract, a cyber insurance renewal or a board member asks whether you follow the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. Saying yes is easy. Showing the access review, the risk assessment, the supplier check and the incident exercise with dates on them is the part most small teams cannot do from a spreadsheet. Complies turns the framework into a calendar of owned, evidenced work.
From $47/mo · Prices published · No sales call · Monthly billing
Audit readiness
0 %
Built for teams of 5 to 200
What NIST CSF compliance software does for a team without a GRC department
NIST CSF compliance software turns the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into work a team can run and prove. The framework is a set of outcomes, 6 Functions, 22 Categories and 106 Subcategories, and it tells you what good looks like without telling you who does what or when. The software assigns each outcome to an owner, sets a review cadence, stores the evidence with a date, and reports where the gaps are, so that "we align with NIST CSF" is backed by records a customer, insurer or examiner can read.
Complies ships a ready-made NIST CSF 2.0 obligation library on every paid plan. Load it and you get 23 recurring obligations, one for each of the 22 Categories from GV.OC to RC.CO plus an annual review of your Current and Target Profiles, and six policy titles your team drafts and approves. Starter is $47 a month billed yearly. Growth, at $119, adds the risk register, vendor due diligence, evidence collection and readiness scoring. Scale, at $299, runs NIST CSF as its own framework next to SOC 2 or ISO 27001. Prices are published and there is no sales call.
Complies assists with compliance workflows. It is not legal advice, and it does not certify you or guarantee audit outcomes. Your auditor decides; Complies gets you ready.
The three things a NIST CSF 2.0 program has to show, and what software has to hold for each
Governance somebody actually owns
Govern is the Function that CSF 2.0 added in February 2024, and it is where small programs are thinnest: risk appetite, roles, policy, leadership oversight and supply chain risk. Complies gives each Govern Category a named owner and an annual review, and keeps the approved policy versions behind GV.PO as evidence.
policy management softwareRecurring work with a date on it
Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond and Recover only count if the work repeats. The library sets a cadence for each Category: a quarterly access and MFA review for PR.AA, a monthly monitoring review for DE.CM, a six-month asset inventory update for ID.AM, and an annual tabletop exercise and recovery test.
compliance obligation trackingEvidence a third party can read
Nobody certifies NIST CSF, so the proof is your own record. Each completed obligation carries the file that proves it, the person who did it and the date. The readiness report shows what is current, what is overdue and what has no evidence yet, which is the document a customer or insurer is really asking for.
evidence collection softwareNIST CSF compliance software compared with the two ways teams usually run the framework
Most small teams start with a spreadsheet exported from the NIST CSF 2.0 Reference Tool. Larger security teams buy an assessment-led GRC platform. This is how each approach handles what a CSF program needs once the first assessment is over, including where Complies is not the right answer.
| What a CSF 2.0 program needs | Spreadsheet from the NIST reference tool | Assessment-led GRC platform | Complies |
|---|---|---|---|
| The framework content itself | All 106 Subcategories with informative references, exported at no cost | All Subcategories as a questionnaire sent to unit owners | 23 recurring obligations by Category, with references such as GV.SC and PR.AA on each |
| Owners and due dates | A column someone has to keep current by hand | Assessment campaigns with assignees and deadlines | An owner and a cadence on every obligation, with email reminders before the due date |
| Evidence behind each answer | Links to folders that drift out of date | Evidence uploads attached to assessment answers | A dated file on each completed obligation, kept in the history on Growth |
| Tier and maturity scoring per Subcategory | Possible with your own formulas | Built in, usually with Current and Target Profile reports | Not built in. Readiness is measured from obligations done, evidence held and policies approved |
| Reuse for SOC 2, ISO 27001 or HIPAA | A second spreadsheet | Crosswalks between frameworks, depending on the tier | Each obligation counts toward a shared control area on the control map on Growth |
| Price for a 5 to 200 person company | Staff time | Quote-only at most vendors, often an annual contract in five figures | $47, $119 or $299 a month billed yearly, published |
Read that honestly. If your security team needs to score every one of the 106 Subcategories against Tiers 1 to 4 and distribute assessments across business units, an assessment-led platform does that and Complies does not. If your problem is that the assessment was done once and nothing has a date on it since, a calendar of owned obligations with evidence is the cheaper and more useful fix. If you are also comparing broader compliance platforms that list NIST CSF among their frameworks, see the detail on Hyperproof alternatives, Secureframe alternatives and VComply alternatives.
NIST CSF compliance software vendors, what each covers and what each publishes on price
We opened each vendor's own product and pricing pages on October 7, 2026. Only two of the six publish a dollar figure, so read the coverage column before the price column.
| Option | What it covers | Who it fits | Published pricing (October 2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complies | NIST CSF 2.0 library with 23 recurring obligations and six policies, risk register, vendor due diligence, dated evidence; NIST CSF as its own framework on Scale | Companies of 5 to 200 people with no dedicated GRC team that have to show a customer, insurer or board a running program | Yes. Starter $47, Growth $119, Scale $299 a month billed yearly; $95, $239 and $599 monthly |
| Isora GRC | Assessment management, asset and vendor inventories, risk and exception registers, with NIST CSF assessments sent to unit owners | Security teams that run assessments across many departments, units or vendors | No. Its pricing page names four plans, Solo, Team, Enterprise and Unlimited, each with a Request Pricing button |
| Hyperproof | Compliance operations platform with a NIST CSF program template, control crosswalks and automated evidence collection | Compliance teams running many frameworks at once with a full-time owner | No. Vendr reports a median contract of $41,400 a year across 44 purchases, range $22,215 to $70,000 |
| Apptega | Framework assessments, program and risk manager, reports, tasking and policy libraries | Security teams and the MSPs and MSSPs that deliver compliance programs to clients | No. Essentials (1 framework) has a trial; Plus (3 frameworks) and Premium (5) say Request pricing |
| Secureframe | Compliance automation with integrations, policies, training and vendor management across many frameworks | Cloud software companies that need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 first and NIST CSF alongside | Partly. Fundamentals starts at $7,500 a year for one framework; other tiers are quoted |
| CyberSaint CyberStrong | Cyber risk and compliance platform with control assessment and risk quantification | Enterprises that want cyber risk expressed in financial terms for the board | No. Sold as annual or multi-year subscriptions, with no figures on the site |
The honest dividing line is who does the work. Isora, Apptega and CyberStrong are built around the assessment, which suits a security team that surveys many units. Hyperproof and Secureframe are built around automated evidence across many frameworks. Complies is built around the calendar, for a company where the person running NIST CSF also runs IT or operations and needs reminders and proof more than scoring.
What changes when NIST CSF lives in compliance software instead of a one-time assessment
The Govern Function stops being a blank column
Six of the 22 Categories sit under Govern, and they are the ones a spreadsheet assessment leaves at "partially". Risk appetite, roles, policy, oversight and supply chain risk each become an annual obligation with an owner, so there is a dated approval to point to.
A cyber insurance application takes an hour, not a week
Insurers ask about MFA, backups, training, incident response and vendor management. Those are PR.AA, PR.DS, PR.AT, RS.MA and GV.SC. When each has a last-done date and a file, the application is a lookup and your answers are ones you can stand behind after a claim.
Customer security reviews get the same answer every time
Enterprise customers and public sector buyers write "aligned with NIST CSF" into contracts and questionnaires. On Growth, the questionnaire tool drafts answers from your recorded obligations, approved policies and evidence dates, so sales stops guessing.
Suppliers have a criticality rating and a next review date
Supply chain risk management became its own Category, GV.SC, in version 2.0. Vendor due diligence on Growth records each supplier with a tier, the SOC 2 report on file, the security terms in the contract and the date you last looked.
One program answers several frameworks
The access review, risk assessment, training record and incident exercise you keep for NIST CSF are the same ones SOC 2, ISO 27001 and HIPAA ask for. Each library obligation counts toward a shared control area, so adding a certification later does not start from zero.
A price a small company can approve without procurement
Starter is $47 a month billed yearly with the NIST CSF 2.0 library included. Growth at $119 adds the risk register, vendor due diligence and evidence. Scale at $299 adds custom frameworks, roles and an audit export pack. Monthly billing is $95, $239 and $599.
Setting up NIST CSF 2.0 in Complies
Load the NIST CSF 2.0 library
From the calendar, load the library onto a running framework or, on Scale, as its own framework. 23 obligations arrive with their cadence: monthly monitoring review, quarterly access and patch reviews, six-month inventory and improvement reviews, and annual governance, risk, supplier, exercise and recovery work.
Give every obligation an owner
Assign each one to the person who really does the work: IT for access and patching, operations for suppliers, leadership for risk appetite and oversight. Reminders go to the owner before the due date, not to a shared inbox.
Draft and approve the six policies
Cybersecurity risk management, asset management, identity and access management, the incident response plan, the recovery plan and supply chain risk management. Start from a drafted version, edit it to match how your company works, and approve it.
Attach your profiles and run the year
Upload the Current and Target Profiles you built from the NIST template as evidence on the annual profile review, then work through the obligations as they come due. The readiness report and obligation history are what you hand a customer, insurer or board.
Who this is for, and who it is not
A GOOD FIT WHEN
- You are a 5 to 200 person company and a customer contract, a cyber insurance renewal or a state or federal buyer asks you to show alignment with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework.
- You did a NIST CSF self-assessment in a spreadsheet once and cannot show what has been reviewed since.
- The person who owns security also runs IT or operations, and needs reminders and a dated record more than a scoring model.
- You expect to add SOC 2, ISO 27001 or HIPAA later and want the same evidence to count twice.
LOOK ELSEWHERE WHEN
- You need Tier 1 to 4 maturity scoring for each of the 106 Subcategories, or assessments distributed across dozens of business units. An assessment-led GRC platform does that; Complies does not.
- You need NIST SP 800-171, CMMC or FedRAMP. Those are different requirement sets with their own assessment rules, and Complies does not ship them.
- You need the technical controls themselves: MFA, endpoint protection, vulnerability scanning, log monitoring or backups. Those come from your IT stack; Complies tracks that they are in place and reviewed.
- You want cyber risk quantified in dollars for the board. That is a risk quantification product, and the risk register in Complies uses likelihood and impact ratings.
NIST CSF compliance software questions buyers ask
NIST CSF compliance software is a tool that turns the NIST Cybersecurity Framework into assigned, recurring work with evidence. It holds the Categories and Subcategories, gives each an owner and a review date, stores the proof, and reports gaps. Some products center on scoring assessments; others, like Complies, center on a calendar of obligations and the dated record behind each one.
For most private companies, no. The framework is voluntary guidance. It becomes a requirement in practice when a customer contract, a cyber insurance policy or a regulator names it. Federal agencies have had to use it since Executive Order 13800 in 2017, and Ohio, Utah and Connecticut give companies that follow a recognized framework such as NIST CSF a legal defense in data breach lawsuits.
No. NIST does not certify organizations against the Cybersecurity Framework and does not accredit anyone to do so. What exists is a self-assessment or a third-party assessment report. That is why the record matters: without a certificate, the dated evidence of reviews, exercises and approvals is the only proof that your program runs.
Version 2.0, published on February 26, 2024, added a sixth Function, Govern, alongside Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond and Recover. It widened the scope from critical infrastructure to every organization, expanded supply chain risk management into its own Category (GV.SC), and reorganized the framework into 22 Categories and 106 Subcategories.
Strictly none, because the framework lists outcomes, not controls. It has 6 Functions, 22 Categories and 106 Subcategories. Each Subcategory points to controls in other documents, such as NIST SP 800-53 or ISO 27001, through informative references. Complies groups the work into 23 recurring obligations, one per Category plus a profile review.
For a company under about 200 people with no GRC team, the best fit is a tool with a published price that assigns the work and keeps the evidence, since scoring 106 Subcategories is rarely the bottleneck. Complies does that from $47 a month. Teams that need distributed assessments and maturity scoring should look at Isora GRC, Apptega or Hyperproof, all of which quote on request.
Complies publishes $47, $119 and $299 a month billed yearly, with the NIST CSF 2.0 library on every paid plan. Secureframe publishes a $7,500 a year starting price for one framework. Isora GRC, Apptega, Hyperproof and CyberSaint showed no figures on their own sites in October 2026; Vendr reports a $41,400 median annual contract for Hyperproof.
Yes, substantially. Access control, risk assessment, supplier management, incident response and training appear in all three. In Complies each NIST CSF obligation names the control area it counts toward, so on Growth it shows on the same control map as SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA and PCI DSS, and evidence collected once counts for each.
No. Complies does not rate each Subcategory against Tiers 1 to 4. Its readiness score is measured from three things: obligations completed on time, evidence on file and policies approved. You keep your Current and Target Profiles as documents attached to the annual profile review, and the action plan becomes owned obligations.
No. NIST CSF is a voluntary set of outcomes for any organization. SP 800-53 is a detailed control catalog used for federal systems, and SP 800-171 is the requirement set for contractors handling controlled unclassified information, assessed under CMMC. Complies ships a NIST CSF 2.0 library; it does not ship SP 800-53, SP 800-171 or CMMC.
Frameworks and guides
SOC 2 compliance software
ISO 27001ISO 27001 compliance software
CROSSWALKControl Mapping Across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and PCI DSS
CROSS-FRAMEWORKSOC 2 vs ISO 27001 and Which One You Need (or Both)
PRICINGHow Much Does Compliance Software Cost in 2026?
VENDORSVendor Risk Assessment Template and Risk Rating Method
Put your NIST CSF 2.0 program on a calendar a customer or insurer can read
Prices published, $47 to $299 a month. Monthly billing. Start today, no sales call.