CONNECTED · OWNED · CURRENT
Evidence collection software for automated evidence collection, SOC 2 evidence and compliance evidence management
Connect your cloud, code and identity systems and the checks auditors sample run every day on their own. Everything a connector cannot reach, from the signed policy to the board minutes, gets an owner, a cadence and a reminder before it goes stale.
From $47/mo · Prices published · No sales call · Monthly billing
Audit readiness
0 %
Built for teams of 5 to 200
What evidence collection software does, and where automation stops
Evidence collection software gathers the proof that your controls work, tags each item to the controls and frameworks it supports, and keeps it current for the whole audit period. Part of that proof can come straight from your systems: whether MFA is enforced in your identity provider, whether CloudTrail is logging, whether the default branch is protected. The rest is documents and records that only a person can produce, such as an approved policy, an access review sign-off or a vendor's SOC 2 report. A useful tool handles both halves, because an auditor samples both.
Complies is evidence collection software for companies of 5 to 200 people running SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR or PCI DSS. On Growth it connects to AWS, GitHub, Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft Entra ID and Jira and runs 14 checks once a day, each recorded as PASS or FAIL with the detail behind it and a dated history. Every manual item gets a named owner, a cadence from monthly to yearly, a due date and an email reminder before it lapses. Each item is filed against a shared control, so one access review counts for SOC 2 and ISO 27001 at the same time. Growth costs $119 a month billed yearly. Scale, at $299, adds a Viewer role for auditors and an export pack with the evidence index as a CSV file.
Complies assists with compliance workflows. It is not legal advice, and it does not certify you or guarantee audit outcomes. Your auditor decides; Complies gets you ready.
Three jobs evidence collection has to do before an auditor opens the folder
Pull system evidence on a schedule, not the week before fieldwork
Each connector runs daily on paid workspaces. A GitHub check confirms two-factor authentication is required for the organization, an AWS check confirms MFA on the root user and that CloudTrail is logging, an Okta check counts active users without a second factor. A failure shows up the next morning, with the reason, instead of in the auditor's sample.
automated evidence collectionGive every manual item an owner and a due date
Policies, access review sign-offs, training records and vendor reports do not live in an API. Each one is assigned to a person with a cadence of one-time, monthly, quarterly, every six months or yearly. The owner is emailed before the due date and again when it is overdue, so nothing goes stale quietly.
compliance obligation trackingCollect once and let every framework count it
Evidence is filed against a shared control area, not a single framework. A quarterly access review is mapped to SOC 2 CC6.1 to CC6.3, ISO 27001 A.5.18 and PCI DSS 7.2.4 at once, so a second framework adds a few new requests instead of a second evidence folder.
control mapping softwareEvidence collection compared, from shared folders to compliance platforms
Most teams shopping for evidence collection software are replacing a shared drive full of screenshots named by date, or they are weighing an integration-heavy platform sold on a quote. This is how the three approaches compare on the work an audit actually asks for, including where Complies is the wrong pick.
| What the audit needs | Shared drive and screenshots | Integration-heavy platform | Complies |
|---|---|---|---|
| System evidence | Screenshots taken by hand, usually in the two weeks before fieldwork | Hundreds of integrations and continuous tests across cloud, HR and endpoint tools | 14 daily checks across AWS, GitHub, Okta, Google Workspace, Entra ID and Jira |
| Manual evidence | Files dropped in a folder with no owner or due date | Owners, requests and reminders inside the platform | Named owner, cadence, due date and email reminders before and after the due date |
| Proof it stayed true all period | Only the days someone remembered to screenshot | Continuous test history | A dated history of every collection, with PASS or FAIL and the detail |
| Reuse across frameworks | Copy the file into a second folder | Cross-mapped controls | One shared control set across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and PCI DSS |
| Handing it to the auditor | Zip the folder and hope the names make sense | Auditor portal, often with partner audit firms | Viewer seats and a CSV export pack with the evidence index on Scale |
| Price | Your engineers' time | Quote-only for most; Vendr medians of $20,000 to $41,400 a year | $119 a month for Growth, $299 for Scale, billed yearly and published |
Read that honestly. If you need device posture from an MDM, HR system syncs for onboarding and offboarding, or hundreds of integrations across a large stack, an integration-heavy platform such as Vanta or Drata covers more ground than Complies does today. If your stack is a cloud account, a code host, an identity provider and a ticketing tool, the 14 checks cover the controls auditors sample most, and the rest is manual evidence that every platform still asks a person to upload. If you are weighing the integration-heavy platforms in detail, compare them on Vanta alternatives, Drata alternatives and Hyperproof alternatives.
Evidence collection software vendors, and what each one publishes on price
We opened each vendor's own site in October 2026. Where no price is published, the table says so and uses Vendr's brokered contract data where a real sample exists, rather than repeating a directory estimate.
| Tool | How it collects evidence | Who it fits | Published pricing (October 2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complies | Daily connector checks for AWS, GitHub, Okta, Google Workspace, Entra ID and Jira, plus owned manual items with cadences and reminders | Companies of 5 to 200 running SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR or PCI DSS | Yes. Growth $119 and Scale $299 a month billed yearly; $239 and $599 billed monthly |
| Vanta | Says it pulls data automatically from 400+ tools and tests controls continuously | Funded startups and mid-market teams that want the widest integration catalog | No. Vendr puts the median near $20,000 a year, February 2026 |
| Drata | Integrates with what it calls hundreds of tools across the stack, with continuous control tests | Startups and mid-market teams that want automation plus guided audits | No. Vendr median $24,868 a year, February 2026 |
| Secureframe | Lists 300+ native integrations, automated evidence collection and continuous control monitoring on its pricing page | Teams that want a platform with a published entry price | Partly. Fundamentals starts at $7,500 a year; Complete and Defense are quote-only |
| Hyperproof | Hypersyncs pull proof from systems such as AWS, Azure and GitHub on a cadence you set and file it on a control | Mid-size and larger compliance teams running many frameworks | No. Vendr median $41,400 a year across 44 purchases |
| AWS Audit Manager | Collects evidence from AWS Config, Security Hub and CloudTrail for AWS resources only | Teams whose audit scope is almost entirely inside AWS | Yes. Usage-based, about $1.25 per 1,000 resource assessments in AWS's own examples |
Two notes. Integration counts measure breadth, not audit coverage: most SOC 2 samples land on a short list of controls (MFA, access reviews, logging, change management, vendor reviews), and every platform still needs people to upload policies and sign-offs. And Vendr medians come from negotiated contracts, not list prices, so treat them as a range to check a quote against.
What changes when evidence collection runs on its own schedule
The pre-audit screenshot sprint goes away
System evidence is collected daily and kept with its date, so when the auditor asks for MFA enforcement in March, you hand over the March record instead of a screenshot taken yesterday.
Failures surface while you can still fix them
A check that flips to FAIL shows the reason, such as the accounts without a second factor or the branch without protection, the next day. Fixing it in week two costs an hour; finding it in the auditor's sample costs an exception in the report.
Manual evidence has a person attached
Every item that a connector cannot reach belongs to someone, with a due date and reminders. The quarterly access review stops depending on whoever remembered it last quarter.
One item, every framework
Because evidence is filed against shared control areas, adding ISO 27001 after SOC 2 surfaces only the requests that are actually new. The rest is already collected and already current.
The auditor gets a clean index
On Scale, the export pack bundles the evidence index, the control map, the obligation history and the readiness report as files, and a Viewer seat lets the auditor read the records without editing them.
A price you can read before any call
Evidence collection and the six connectors come with Growth at $119 a month billed yearly, with 15 seats and all five frameworks. Scale at $299 adds 40 seats, roles and the export pack. Monthly billing is $239 and $599.
From signup to your first automated evidence
Pick your frameworks
Choose SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR or PCI DSS. Complies seeds the evidence requests each one needs against the shared control set, with owners and first due dates you can adjust.
Connect the systems you already run
Add a read-only GitHub token, AWS access keys, an Okta or Entra ID app, a Google Workspace service account or a Jira project. The first run records the checks the same day.
Assign the manual items
Give each remaining request an owner and a cadence. Owners get an email before each due date and again if it slips, and every upload is dated with who collected it.
Watch the readiness score and hand over the index
The readiness page counts current evidence per framework and ranks what is missing or stale. On Scale, export the evidence index for the auditor when fieldwork starts.
Who this is for, and who it is not
A GOOD FIT WHEN
- Your SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence lives in a shared drive of screenshots, and the last audit cost your engineers a week of collecting.
- Your stack is a cloud account, a code host, an identity provider and a ticketing tool, and you want those checks running daily without a six-figure platform.
- You run more than one framework and want each piece of evidence collected once and counted everywhere it applies.
- You want a published price and monthly billing instead of a demo, a quote and a 12-month contract.
LOOK ELSEWHERE WHEN
- You need device posture from an MDM, HR system syncs, or a catalog of hundreds of integrations. A broader platform such as Vanta or Drata fits better.
- You need forensic or legal evidence collection from laptops and phones. That is a digital forensics tool, not compliance software.
- Your audit scope sits entirely inside AWS and nobody needs manual evidence tracked. AWS Audit Manager alone may be enough.
- You need an auditor bundled into the price. Complies does not sell audits; you bring your own CPA firm.
Evidence collection software questions buyers ask before choosing a tool
Evidence collection software gathers the proof that security and compliance controls are working, links each item to the controls it supports and keeps it current through the audit period. It pulls some evidence directly from systems such as AWS, GitHub or Okta and tracks the rest, such as policies and review sign-offs, with owners and due dates. Complies does both from $119 a month billed yearly.
Automated evidence collection means a tool reads settings and records from your systems through their APIs on a schedule, instead of a person taking screenshots. In Complies, connectors for AWS, GitHub, Okta, Google Workspace, Entra ID and Jira run daily and save each check as PASS or FAIL with its details and a dated history the auditor can sample.
No. System settings such as MFA, logging and branch protection can be collected automatically, but a large share of SOC 2 evidence is human: approved policies, access review sign-offs, risk assessments, vendor reviews and training records. Any vendor promising full automation is still asking you to upload those. The useful goal is automating the system checks and putting owners and dates on everything else.
SOC 2 auditors typically sample evidence for access control (MFA, user lists, access reviews), change management (approved and tested changes), logging and monitoring, incident response, vendor management, risk assessment, HR (background checks, training) and policies. For a Type 2 report they want proof the control operated across the whole period, which is why dated, recurring evidence matters more than one screenshot.
Published prices are rare. Complies includes evidence collection and its connectors in Growth at $119 a month billed yearly. Secureframe Fundamentals starts at $7,500 a year. Vanta, Drata and Hyperproof are quote-only, with Vendr medians of about $20,000, $24,868 and $41,400 a year. AWS Audit Manager is usage-based at about $1.25 per 1,000 resource assessments.
Complies connects to AWS (root user MFA, IAM password policy, S3 Block Public Access, CloudTrail logging), GitHub (required two-factor authentication, default branch protection, members and owners), Okta (password policies, MFA enrollment, users with a second factor), Google Workspace (2-Step Verification), Microsoft Entra ID (MFA and directory accounts) and Jira (change tickets resolved in the last 90 days).
Connector checks run once a day on paid workspaces, and a same-day re-run replaces its own entry rather than stacking copies. Manual evidence follows the cadence you set per item: one-time, monthly, quarterly, every six months or yearly. Each collection is kept in a dated log, so you can show the auditor the state of a control at any point in the period.
Yes. Complies files evidence against a shared control area rather than a single framework, so an item counts for every framework that control serves. A quarterly access review counts toward SOC 2, ISO 27001 and PCI DSS together. Cross-framework mapping is part of Growth, which runs all five frameworks on one control set.
Not quite. Evidence collection gathers and maintains the proof; audit management covers the audit itself, such as requests, fieldwork and findings. Complies focuses on the first half and on readiness: it collects and tracks evidence, scores readiness per framework and exports the evidence index for your auditor, who runs the audit in their own tools.
No. Complies does not perform audits or issue SOC 2 reports, and the readiness score is not an audit opinion. It keeps your evidence current and organized so the audit goes faster. You hire an independent CPA firm for SOC 2 or an accredited certification body for ISO 27001, and give them Viewer access or the export pack on Scale.
Frameworks and guides
SOC 2 compliance software
ISO 27001ISO 27001 compliance software
CROSS-FRAMEWORKAudit Evidence Examples Auditors Actually Ask For
SOC 2SOC 2 Controls List With All 33 CC1 to CC9 Common Criteria
SOC 2SOC 2 Audit Process and SOC 2 Audit Preparation
AUTOMATECompliance Automation vs Manual Monitoring, When to Switch
Collect audit evidence every day, not the week before fieldwork
Prices published, $47 to $299 a month. Monthly billing. Start today, no sales call.