AUDITBOARD · CROSSCOMPLY · OPTRO
AuditBoard CrossComply alternatives, CrossComply pricing, and a cheaper way to run SOC 2 and ISO 27001
CrossComply is the IT compliance module of the platform formerly called AuditBoard, now Optro. It is a strong product built for enterprise programs, and it is sold by demo and quote only. If you need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 run properly without an enterprise GRC contract, here is the honest comparison.
From $79/mo · Prices published · No sales call · Monthly billing
Audit readiness
0 %
Built for teams of 5 to 200
What AuditBoard CrossComply is, what it costs, and when an alternative makes sense
The realistic AuditBoard CrossComply alternatives are Complies for teams of 5 to 200 that want SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and PCI DSS cross-mapped at a published price, Vanta, Drata or Secureframe for funded startups that prefer a sales-led rollout, and Hyperproof or ServiceNow IRM for enterprises that want a comparable multi-framework suite from a different vendor. CrossComply itself publishes no price. It sits inside the Optro platform, the name AuditBoard adopted in 2026, and both its product page and the Optro pricing page end in a demo request rather than a number.
We read the CrossComply product page at optro.ai first-hand on September 16, 2026. It describes multi-framework compliance "like ISO 27001, SOC2, NIST CSF, and more", AI-powered gap assessments, control mapping and evidence collection, out-of-the-box continuous monitoring templates for common IT controls, separate compliance programs for each auditable entity with shared controls and evidence, and support for emerging AI frameworks. The same page says Optro is trusted by over 50 percent of the Fortune 500. That is an accurate picture of the buyer it is built for: a large company with several legal entities, an internal audit function, and very often a SOX program already running on the same platform.
Because neither Optro nor the old AuditBoard site publishes a rate card, the closest thing to a real number is brokered contract data. Vendr reported a median AuditBoard contract of about $45,895 a year across 85 purchases in February 2026, with a range of roughly $21,180 to $110,551. That figure covers whatever modules each buyer licensed, not CrossComply on its own, so read it as the order of magnitude for the platform rather than a module price. For comparison, Vendr reports medians around $20,000 a year for Vanta and Secureframe and $24,868 for Drata.
Complies takes the other motion. Prices sit on the pricing page: Starter $79, Growth $199 and Scale $499 a month billed yearly, with monthly billing available. Growth cross-maps all five built-in frameworks, tracks evidence with named owners and due dates, and includes the risk register and vendor due diligence. The honest boundary: Complies does not run SOX 404 testing, internal audit fieldwork, per-entity audit programs or AI governance, and its built-in library is SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and PCI DSS rather than NIST CSF (Scale lets you add your own framework). If CrossComply is one module of a platform your internal audit team already lives in, stay on it. If it is the only module you were quoted for, you are probably paying for a suite to do a compliance automation job.
Complies assists with compliance workflows. It is not legal advice, and it does not certify you or guarantee audit outcomes. Your auditor decides; Complies gets you ready.
The three jobs CrossComply is bought to do, and what each one needs at 5 to 200 people
Map one control set to several frameworks
This is the core CrossComply pitch and the part worth paying for in any tool: write the access review control once and let it satisfy SOC 2 CC6.2, ISO 27001 A.5.18 and PCI DSS requirement 7.2.4 at the same time. Complies ships SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and PCI DSS already cross-mapped from the Growth plan, so a second framework starts from the controls you already operate instead of a blank spreadsheet.
control mapping softwareCollect evidence on a schedule, with an owner
Enterprise suites automate evidence at scale across hundreds of systems. A smaller program needs the same discipline with less machinery: every control lists the evidence it needs, each item has a named owner and a due date, and integrations with AWS, GitHub, Google Workspace, Okta and Jira pull much of it on a schedule. An item attached to a cross-mapped control counts in every framework it satisfies.
compliance evidence collectionShow an auditor you are ready before fieldwork
Suites answer this with dashboards built for an audit committee. A 60 person company needs something plainer: which controls have current evidence, which are overdue, and who owns each gap. Readiness scores and gap flags per framework answer that in one view, and the Scale plan adds the audit-ready export pack you hand to the auditor at the start of fieldwork.
audit readiness softwareCrossComply compared with the two cheaper ways to run a multi-framework program
Most comparisons grade CrossComply against other enterprise GRC suites. That is the right comparison for a Fortune 500 security team and the wrong one for most people searching this phrase, who are really deciding whether they need an enterprise suite at all. Here is the split that decides it.
| What you are comparing | Optro CrossComply | Compliance automation (Vanta, Drata, Secureframe) | Complies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who it is built for | Large enterprises running audit, risk and compliance on one platform, often alongside SOX | Funded startups and mid-market SaaS going through SOC 2 or ISO 27001 with a guided rollout | Teams of 5 to 200 without a GRC department that want to run the program themselves |
| Frameworks | ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST CSF and more, with framework import | Large prebuilt libraries, with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 at the core | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and PCI DSS cross-mapped, plus your own frameworks on Scale |
| Multiple legal entities | Separate programs per auditable entity with shared controls and evidence | Varies by vendor and plan | One workspace per company. Not built for many entities under one program |
| SOX and internal audit | Yes, on the same platform through Controls Management and OpsAudit | Generally not the focus | No. We do not run SOX testing or audit fieldwork |
| Evidence collection | AI-assisted collection plus continuous monitoring templates | Automated tests across many integrations, the center of the product | Owners and due dates per item, with AWS, GitHub, Google Workspace, Okta and Jira integrations |
| Published price | None. Demo request only | Secureframe publishes $7,000 a year for Fundamentals; Vanta and Drata publish nothing | Starter $79, Growth $199, Scale $499 a month billed yearly |
| Brokered median (Vendr, February 2026) | About $45,895 a year for the AuditBoard platform, modules combined | Vanta about $20,000, Secureframe $20,000, Drata $24,868 | Not needed. The price is on the pricing page |
| Contract | Enterprise agreement scoped per module | Annual contracts are the norm | Monthly or yearly billing, no forced annual term |
| Time to a working control library | An implementation project | Weeks, with vendor onboarding | The same day you sign up |
Read the third and fourth rows first. If you need separate compliance programs for several auditable entities, or your SOX program already lives on Optro, CrossComply is the better tool and adding it to your existing agreement is usually the sensible purchase. The price rows only matter once both of those answers are no. Compare the whole AuditBoard suite and its alternatives in detail on AuditBoard alternatives, Hyperproof alternatives and Vanta alternatives.
What each CrossComply alternative publishes about price, read off its own site in September 2026
The question buyers ask us most about CrossComply is not which tool maps more frameworks. It is whether they can find out what it costs without a sales cycle. Here is what each vendor states on its own site. Where a vendor publishes nothing we say so and give the brokered benchmark with its date, rather than repeating an estimate as if it were a rate card.
| Product | How it is sold | Published price | What it is genuinely best at |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optro CrossComply | One product of the Optro platform, formerly AuditBoard, listed next to Controls Management, OpsAudit, RiskOversight and third-party risk | None. Product and pricing pages both end in a demo request | Multi-entity, multi-framework programs at enterprises that also run SOX and internal audit on Optro |
| Hyperproof | Compliance, risk, audit and third-party risk modules on one platform | None. Vendr median $41,400 a year across 44 purchases | A very large framework library, which Hyperproof puts at 160 or more, for mid-market and enterprise teams |
| Vanta | Compliance automation platform with add-on products such as TPRM | None. Vendr median about $20,000 a year | Automated tests and integrations for startups moving fast through SOC 2 and ISO 27001 |
| Drata | Compliance automation platform | None. Vendr median $24,868 a year | Continuous control monitoring and a strong auditor network |
| Secureframe | Fundamentals, Complete and Defense plans | Fundamentals starting at $7,000 a year for one framework; higher plans quoted | Guided, service-heavy rollouts for teams that want a hands-off first audit |
| Complies | Three self-serve plans, all five frameworks cross-mapped from Growth | $79, $199 and $499 a month billed yearly; monthly billing available | Running SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and PCI DSS without a GRC department |
Vendr medians are brokered contract data, not list prices, and the AuditBoard figure covers the platform as each buyer licensed it, not CrossComply alone. We quote them because they are the only numbers in this category with a disclosed sample. Treat them as a budgeting range and ask every vendor for a written quote.
What changes when you run SOC 2 and ISO 27001 without an enterprise suite
A price you can put in a budget today
Starter $79, Growth $199 and Scale $499 a month billed yearly, published on the pricing page. CrossComply requires a demo before you learn whether it fits your budget, and the answer depends on which modules the sales team proposes.
Frameworks cross-mapped from the first control
SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and PCI DSS share one control library on Growth and Scale. Adding ISO 27001 after SOC 2 starts from the controls you already run rather than becoming a second project with a second consultant.
Evidence with a name and a date on it
Every evidence item has an owner and a due date, so the question an auditor actually asks, who provided this and when, has an answer that does not depend on someone searching a shared drive the week before fieldwork.
Risks and vendors next to the controls
The risk register and vendor due diligence are included from Growth. SOC 2 CC9.2 and ISO 27001 A.5.19 to A.5.22 both require vendor management, and that evidence lands in the same library as the rest of the program.
No implementation project
You sign up and start mapping controls the same day. There is no statement of work, no module scoping call and no services engagement to schedule before the first framework is loaded.
Monthly billing when you want it
Enterprise GRC is sold on annual agreements. Complies bills monthly or yearly, so a company that is not yet sure it will need ISO 27001 next year is not locked into a suite contract to find out.
Moving a SOC 2 or ISO 27001 program off CrossComply without losing the audit trail
Export controls, mappings and evidence before renewal
Pull the control list with its framework mappings, the evidence files with their dates, and any open issues or exceptions. Do it at least 60 days before the renewal date so the export is not happening under notice-period pressure.
Decide what stays on Optro
If internal audit or SOX runs on the same platform, those modules may well be worth keeping. Moving only the IT compliance program is a legitimate outcome and is often the cheapest one.
Match your controls to the built-in library
Map your existing control IDs to the SOC 2 and ISO 27001 controls already in Complies. Controls you wrote yourself stay as written, and on Scale a framework outside the built-in five can be added as your own.
Assign owners and dates before the next audit window
Every control and evidence item gets a named owner and a due date. Run the readiness view against your next audit period and close the gaps it flags while there is still time to produce evidence for them.
Who this is for, and who it is not
A GOOD FIT WHEN
- You were quoted for CrossComply or the Optro platform and only need SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR or PCI DSS.
- Your company has 5 to 200 people and no internal audit department.
- You want to see the price before you book a call.
- You run one legal entity, or a few managed as a single program.
- You want monthly billing instead of an enterprise agreement.
LOOK ELSEWHERE WHEN
- Your SOX 404 program already runs on Optro and you want IT compliance on the same platform.
- You need separate compliance programs for many auditable entities with shared controls.
- NIST CSF, or a large importable library of frameworks, is central to your program.
- You need AI governance or business continuity modules alongside compliance.
- You have a staffed GRC team that reports to a board and audit committee from the platform.
Questions buyers ask about AuditBoard CrossComply
CrossComply is the IT compliance module of the platform formerly called AuditBoard, which now operates as Optro. It manages multi-framework programs such as ISO 27001, SOC 2 and NIST CSF from one control set, with AI-assisted gap assessments, control mapping, evidence collection and continuous monitoring templates. It is sold alongside Optro's audit, SOX and risk products.
Optro does not publish a price for CrossComply or any other module; its product and pricing pages both end in a demo request. Vendr reported a median AuditBoard contract of about $45,895 a year in February 2026 across 85 purchases, but that covers whatever modules each buyer licensed, so a CrossComply-only deal is scoped on its own terms.
No. Optro is the company and platform name that replaced AuditBoard. CrossComply is one product inside it, listed on optro.ai next to Controls Management, Autonomous Testing, AI Governance, OpsAudit, BCM, RiskOversight, Cyber Risk Management, RegComply and third-party risk management. The customer login still runs on auditboardapp.com, so expect both names in your paperwork.
For teams of 5 to 200, Complies publishes its price and cross-maps SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and PCI DSS from $199 a month billed yearly. Vanta, Drata and Secureframe suit funded startups that want a guided rollout. Hyperproof and ServiceNow IRM are the closer like-for-like picks for enterprises that need a comparable suite from a different vendor.
Yes. Optro's compliance product page names ISO 27001, SOC 2 and NIST CSF and describes importing further frameworks. Its control mapping lets one control count toward several of them, which is the main reason enterprises buy it, and the same idea sits at the center of every modern compliance automation tool, including ours.
Usually not on its own. CrossComply earns its price when it shares a platform with SOX, internal audit and enterprise risk, and when it manages programs for several legal entities. A 50 person SaaS company going through its first SOC 2 pays for that enterprise depth without using it, while a compliance automation tool gets it through the same audit.
Optro lists CrossComply as a separate product, so scoping a quote to that module alone is a reasonable request. Put it in writing before the demo, because suite vendors tend to propose bundles. In the same email ask whether implementation and services are billed separately and what the renewal uplift is, since those lines move the multi-year total most.
Several things, stated plainly. CrossComply runs separate programs for multiple auditable entities, shares a platform with SOX testing and internal audit, covers emerging AI governance frameworks, and ships NIST CSF in its library. Complies does none of those. It runs one company's SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and PCI DSS program at a price published on its site.
For a single-entity SOC 2 or ISO 27001 program, plan on a few weeks of part-time work: exporting controls and evidence, matching control IDs to the new library, and reassigning owners. The date that matters is your audit period. Switch between audits, not in the middle of an observation window where evidence should come from one system.
Frameworks and guides
SOC 2 compliance software
ISO 27001ISO 27001 compliance software
PCI DSSPCI DSS compliance software
SOXSOX Compliance Software: Best Tools for Pre-IPO Companies
GRCGRC Platform vs Compliance Software: Which to Choose
ISO27001Best ISO 27001 Software: Audit and Compliance Tools Compared
PRICINGHow Much Does Compliance Software Cost in 2026?
Run SOC 2 and ISO 27001 at a price you can read before the demo
Prices published, $79 to $499 a month. Monthly billing. Start today, no sales call.