Workiva competitors and Workiva alternatives for SOX and SEC reporting teams
Workiva is a strong platform and more than 6,700 companies run their reporting on it. The useful question is which part of it you actually use, because each part has a different set of competitors and a very different price.
Workiva's main competitors split by job. For SEC reporting and filing, the like-for-like rivals are Donnelley Financial Solutions (DFIN) with ActiveDisclosure and Toppan Merrill with Bridge. For SOX, controls and internal audit, the rivals are Optro (the platform formerly called AuditBoard) and Diligent. For the financial close that feeds the filing, BlackLine and FloQast. And for the IT general controls half of SOX at a company of 5 to 200 people, Complies covers it at a published $47 to $299 a month. Workiva publishes no prices. Its pricing page is a demo form, and its FAQ says all Workiva offerings come with unlimited seats or users and that some solutions use good, better and best packaging. The only benchmark with a disclosed sample is Vendr's buyer data: a median of $49,420 a year across 164 purchases, last updated January 2026, covering every Workiva solution together.
Workiva sells more than one product. Its finance side handles annual and interim financial reporting, SEC reporting, capital market transactions, ESEF and multi-entity reporting. Its risk side handles controls management, SOX compliance, audit management and policies and procedures, and a sustainability side handles CSRD and ESG reporting. Every plan includes 70+ connectors to systems such as Oracle, Salesforce, Workday and BlackLine. That breadth is the reason one company pays near the bottom of Vendr's range and another pays over $150,000: the bill follows how many solutions you buy. So before you compare Workiva to anything, write down which of those jobs you are replacing. If it is the 10-K and the XBRL tagging, look at DFIN and Toppan Merrill. If it is the SOX program, look at Optro, Diligent and FloQast. If what you really need is quarterly access reviews, change approvals and an owner on every SOX obligation before your first 404(a) assessment, that is a much smaller purchase, and it is the one Complies is built for.
WHERE WORKIVA IS GENUINELY STRONG
- One platform for the filing and the controls behind it: SEC reporting, financial statements, SOX, internal audit and ESG share the same linked data, so a number changed once updates everywhere it appears.
- Unlimited seats on every offering, stated in its own pricing FAQ, plus 70+ connectors including Oracle, Salesforce, Workday and BlackLine, which suits a finance team that pulls in many contributors.
- Depth at public-company scale: more than 6,700 customers, a partner network of audit and advisory firms that run SOX programs on it, and an agentic AI layer for control testing.
Workiva vs Complies, on what matters
| Dimension | Workiva | Complies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A connected reporting, risk and sustainability platform for public and pre-IPO companies | A compliance tool for 5 to 200 person teams that need SOX ITGC and security frameworks owned and evidenced |
| SEC filing and XBRL | Yes. 10-K, 10-Q, ESEF and capital market documents are a core product | No. Complies does not draft, tag or file anything with the SEC |
| SOX coverage | The full program: risk and control matrix, testing, issues, certifications and audit management | The IT general controls half plus a SOX obligation library for sections 302, 404, 409 and 906, each with an owner and a due date |
| Pricing | Quote only. Vendr median $49,420 a year across 164 purchases, all solutions together | Published: $47, $119 and $299 a month billed yearly |
| Contract | Annual, negotiated per solution or bundle through a sales cycle | Monthly billing available, cancel anytime, yearly rate if you want it |
| Time to start | Demo, scoping and an implementation, often with a partner firm | Sign up and load the SOX library the same day |
| Who it fits | Controllers, SEC reporting and internal audit teams at public companies | A finance or IT lead at a small company preparing for its first SOX year, or running ITGC next to SOC 2 |
WHEN WORKIVA IS THE BETTER CHOICE
If you file with the SEC and want your financial statements, XBRL and SOX program in one linked system, or you run an internal audit team testing hundreds of controls, Workiva is the stronger product and you will use most of what you pay for. Complies does not replace the filing side at all.
What Workiva costs, and what its competitors cost
Workiva does not publish a price. Checked on October 12, 2026, its pricing page carries a demo form and an FAQ: pricing reflects "the value and needs of each organization", some solutions use good, better and best packaging, and "All Workiva offerings provide unlimited seats or users." Vendr, which brokers software contracts, reports a median Workiva contract of $49,420 a year across 164 purchases, with most contracts between $12,736 and $153,365 and an average saving of about 11% against the first quote. That figure blends every Workiva solution, so a company buying only SEC reporting should expect less and one buying SOX, audit and ESG together should expect more.
The competitors price the same way, quote first, so the comparable numbers are Vendr medians too: Donnelley Financial Solutions $27,000 a year from 16 purchases, Diligent $26,250 from 73, FloQast $24,481 from 312, BlackLine $40,125 from 74 and Optro, under its AuditBoard listing, $45,947 from 86. Toppan Merrill has a single Vendr purchase, which is not a benchmark, so we do not quote it. None of these is a list price and each covers a different job, which is why a cheaper median is not automatically a cheaper choice for you.
Our full source-by-source breakdown of the Workiva quote, including what moves it and how to negotiate, is in the Workiva pricing guide on our blog. If you need a number today rather than after a demo, Complies publishes all three plans on its pricing page.
Workiva competitors compared by the job they replace
Grouped by which part of Workiva each one competes with, because a filing tool, a SOX platform and a close tool are three different purchases. Pricing figures are Vendr medians read on October 12, 2026, with the purchase count beside each. Where a vendor has no benchmark with a usable sample, the table says so instead of guessing.
| Workiva competitor | Which part of Workiva it replaces | What it costs | Who it fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donnelley Financial Solutions (ActiveDisclosure) | SEC reporting, filing and XBRL | Quote only. Vendr median $27,000 a year, 16 purchases | Public companies that want a filing agent and software from the same firm |
| Toppan Merrill (Bridge) | SEC reporting, filing and XBRL | Quote only. One Vendr purchase, no usable benchmark | Filers that want full-service financial printing support behind the software |
| Optro (formerly AuditBoard) | SOX, controls management and internal audit | Quote only. Vendr median $45,947 a year, 86 purchases | Internal audit and SOX teams at mid-size and large public companies |
| Diligent | Audit, risk and board governance | Quote only. Vendr median $26,250 a year, 73 purchases | Companies that want board reporting and audit management under one vendor |
| BlackLine | The financial close and reconciliations that feed the report | Quote only. Vendr median $40,125 a year, 74 purchases | Accounting teams automating a large month-end close |
| FloQast | The close checklist, reconciliations and SOX controls tied to them | Quote only. Vendr median $24,481 a year, 312 purchases | Controllers who want close management and SOX controls in one tool |
| Complies | The IT general controls half of SOX, plus the SOX obligation calendar | Published: $47 to $299 a month | Pre-IPO and newly public companies of 5 to 200 people, and teams running SOX ITGC next to SOC 2 |
Vendr medians are brokered-contract data, not list prices, and each one blends whatever mix of modules its buyers took. They are here because none of these vendors publishes a figure and Vendr is the only source that states its sample. Per-user Workiva prices that circulate on directory pages describe an older license model and conflict with the vendor's own unlimited-seats statement, so we do not repeat them.
What to check before you replace Workiva or buy around it
Which Workiva solutions you actually use
Pull the order form. Many companies bought SEC reporting first and added SOX or ESG later, and each solution has its own competitors. Replacing all of it with one tool rarely works, but replacing the one solution you underuse often does.
Whether the filing and the controls must stay linked
Workiva's main advantage is linked data between the controls, the financial statements and the filing. If your auditors and your SEC reporting team rely on that, moving SOX elsewhere costs you the link. If they do not, it is a feature you are paying for and not using.
How big your SOX scope really is
A company with 40 key controls and three in-scope systems does not need the same platform as one with 500 controls across 40 systems. Count your key controls and in-scope applications before you take any demo.
Whether you need 404(b) yet
Auditor attestation under 404(b) applies to accelerated and large accelerated filers, and emerging growth companies are exempt for up to five years after IPO. The SEC proposed narrowing 404(b) further on May 19, 2026, and the proposal is still not adopted. A company that only owes 404(a) can start much smaller.
Where your ITGC evidence lives
Access reviews, change approvals and backup checks come from Okta, GitHub, AWS and your ticketing system, not from the ERP. Ask any replacement how that evidence gets in, and who owns each item each quarter.
What the renewal does to the price
Quote-only vendors are negotiable in both directions. Vendr reports buyers saving about 11% on Workiva. Ask for the renewal uplift in writing before you sign, whichever vendor you choose.
Switching questions
Workiva's main competitors are Donnelley Financial Solutions and Toppan Merrill for SEC reporting and filing, Optro (formerly AuditBoard) and Diligent for SOX, audit and risk, and BlackLine and FloQast for the financial close that feeds the report. Lists from investor sites mix in unrelated software companies, so judge competitors by the Workiva solution you are replacing rather than by a single ranked list.
For a mid-size or large public company with an internal audit team, Optro is the closest SOX alternative, and FloQast suits controllers who want SOX controls tied to the close. For a company of 5 to 200 people preparing for its first SOX year, the right purchase is usually much smaller: Complies covers the IT general controls half and the 302, 404, 409 and 906 obligations from $47 a month.
Workiva does not publish prices. Vendr reports a median Workiva contract of $49,420 a year across 164 purchases, with most between $12,736 and $153,365, last updated January 2026. That figure blends every Workiva solution, so the price for one solution such as SEC reporting is usually lower and a bundle with SOX and ESG is higher. Workiva says all offerings include unlimited users.
AuditBoard, now Optro, is built around internal audit and SOX workflow, so teams whose main job is testing controls often prefer it. Workiva is stronger when SOX needs to stay linked to the financial statements and the SEC filing in one system. Vendr medians are close: $45,947 for Optro across 86 purchases and $49,420 for Workiva across 164. Pick by whether your SOX work lives with internal audit or with financial reporting.
Yes. Wdesk was the earlier name of Workiva's cloud platform, and older contracts, job listings and reviews still use it. Searches for Wdesk competitors and Workiva competitors describe the same product and the same set of rivals. Today the company sells it as the Workiva platform with separate solutions for financial reporting, risk and sustainability.
Only partly, and we would rather say that plainly. Complies does not draft financial statements, tag XBRL or file with the SEC, so it cannot replace Workiva's reporting side. What it replaces is the SOX controls work for a small company: ITGC access reviews, change approvals and evidence, plus every SOX obligation with an owner and a due date, at a published price.
Not to start SOX. A pre-IPO company needs its controls documented and its ITGC evidence collected before the first 404(a) assessment, which falls in the second annual report after IPO. Many teams buy SEC reporting software closer to the S-1 and run the controls side in a lighter tool first. Emerging growth companies are also exempt from 404(b) auditor attestation for up to five years.
Workiva can work for a small public company, especially for SEC filing, but it is priced and scoped for finance teams with several contributors and a multi-solution program. A 30 person company whose SOX exposure is mostly IT general controls will use a small part of it. Unlimited seats help larger teams more than small ones, because the bill follows solutions, not users.
The direct alternatives for SEC reporting and XBRL filing are Donnelley Financial Solutions with ActiveDisclosure and Toppan Merrill with Bridge, both of which pair software with filing agent services. Vendr reports a DFIN median of $27,000 a year from 16 purchases. Complies is not an SEC reporting tool and is not on this list.
Related: control mapping software · evidence collection software · soc 2 compliance software · iso 27001 compliance software
Try the self-serve way
No demo call. Published pricing, from $47 a month. Email signup only, no credit card.